United States v. James Robert Carlson

Filing

OPINION FILED - THE COURT: James B. Loken, Diana E. Murphy and Steven M. Colloton AUTHORING JUDGE:Diana E. Murphy (PUBLISHED) [4355911] [14-2986, 14-2987, 14-3242]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 www.ca8.uscourts.gov Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court January 14, 2016 West Publishing Opinions Clerk 610 Opperman Drive Building D D4-40 Eagan, MN 55123-0000 RE: 14-2986 United States v. James Robert Carlson 14-2987 United States v. Lava Marie Haugen 14-3242 United States v. Joseph James Gellerman Dear Sirs: A published opinion was filed today in the above cases. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant James Robert Carlson and appeared on the brief was Mark D. Nyvold, of Fridley, MN. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant Lava Marie Haugen and appeared on the brief was John J.E. Markham, II, of Boston, MA. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant Josephy James Gellerman and appeared on the brief was Charles L. Hawkins, of Minneapolis, MN. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee and appeared on the brief was Surya Saxena, AUSA, of Minneapolis, MN. The judge who heard the cases in the district court was Honorable David S. Doty. The judgments of the district court were entered on August 15, 2014 and September 17, 2014. If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court AMT Enclosure(s) cc: MO Lawyers Weekly Appellate Case: 14-2986 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/14/2016 Entry ID: 4355911 District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 0:12-cr-00305-DSD-1 0:12-cr-00305-DSD-2 0:12-cr-00305-DSD-3 Appellate Case: 14-2986 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/14/2016 Entry ID: 4355911

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?