Amarjit Singh, et al v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, Diana E. Murphy and Raymond W. Gruender (UNPUBLISHED) [4275089] [14-3003]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 14-3003 ___________________________ Amarjit Singh; Manjit Kaur; Dripinder Singh lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioners v. Loretta E. Lynch,1 Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent ____________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ____________ Submitted: May 5, 2015 Filed: May 14, 2015 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Amarjit Singh, his wife Manjit Kaur, and their son Dripinder Singh, natives and citizens of India, petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration 1 Loretta E. Lynch is substituted for her predecessor, Eric H. Holder, Jr., as the Attorney General of the United States. See Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2). Appellate Case: 14-3003 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/14/2015 Entry ID: 4275089 Appeals (BIA) denying their fourth motion to reopen removal proceedings. After careful review, we conclude that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion as untimely and numerically barred. See Zheng v. Mukasey, 523 F.3d 893 (8th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2- Appellate Case: 14-3003 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/14/2015 Entry ID: 4275089

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?