Amarjit Singh, et al v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, Diana E. Murphy and Raymond W. Gruender (UNPUBLISHED) [4275089] [14-3003]
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-3003
___________________________
Amarjit Singh; Manjit Kaur; Dripinder Singh
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioners
v.
Loretta E. Lynch,1 Attorney General of the United States
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: May 5, 2015
Filed: May 14, 2015
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Amarjit Singh, his wife Manjit Kaur, and their son Dripinder Singh, natives and
citizens of India, petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration
1
Loretta E. Lynch is substituted for her predecessor, Eric H. Holder, Jr., as the
Attorney General of the United States. See Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2).
Appellate Case: 14-3003
Page: 1
Date Filed: 05/14/2015 Entry ID: 4275089
Appeals (BIA) denying their fourth motion to reopen removal proceedings. After
careful review, we conclude that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the
motion as untimely and numerically barred. See Zheng v. Mukasey, 523 F.3d 893 (8th
Cir. 2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
Appellate Case: 14-3003
Page: 2
Date Filed: 05/14/2015 Entry ID: 4275089
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?