Securitas Critical v. NLRB

Filing

OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Lavenski R. Smith, Kermit E. Bye and Jane Kelly AUTHORING JUDGE:Kermit E. Bye (PUBLISHED) [4381246] [14-3102, 14-3216]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 www.ca8.uscourts.gov Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court March 24, 2016 Mr. Thomas L Henderson OGLETREE & DEAKINS Suite 300 6410 Poplar Avenue Memphis, TN 38119 RE: 14-3102 Securitas Critical v. NLRB 14-3216 NLRB v. Securitas Critical Dear Counsel: The court today issued an opinion in these cases. Judgment in accordance with the opinion was also entered today. The opinion will be released to the public at 10:00 a.m. today. Please hold the opinion in confidence until that time. Please review Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Eighth Circuit Rules on postsubmission procedure to ensure that any contemplated filing is timely and in compliance with the rules. Note particularly that petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc must be received in the clerk's office within 45 days of the date of the entry of judgment. Counsel-filed petitions must be filed electronically in CM/ECF. Paper copies are not required. No grace period for mailing is allowed, and the date of the postmark is irrelevant, for pro-se-filed petitions. Any petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc which is not received within the 45 day period for filing permitted by FRAP 40 may be denied as untimely. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court YML Enclosure(s) cc: Ms. Usha Dheenan Ms. Linda Dreeben Ryan L. Kaess Marlin O. Osthus Mr. Gregoire Sauter Mr. Gary Shinners District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 18-CA-130606 18-CA-130606 Appellate Case: 14-3102 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/24/2016 Entry ID: 4381246

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?