United States v. Michael Hancock
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: James B. Loken, Steven M. Colloton and Jane Kelly (UNPUBLISHED); Granting [4213581-2] motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Ian A. Lewis. [4257080] [14-3257]
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-3257
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Michael D. Hancock
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield
____________
Submitted: February 10, 2015
Filed: March 23, 2015
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Michael Hancock was serving the supervised-release portion of his federal
criminal sentence when his probation officer filed a violation report with the district
Appellate Case: 14-3257
Page: 1
Date Filed: 03/23/2015 Entry ID: 4257080
court1 alleging that Hancock had violated several supervised-release conditions.
Following a hearing, the district court concluded that Hancock had violated his
release conditions and revoked supervised release, imposing a revocation sentence
of 11 months in prison and two years of supervised release. For reversal, Hancock
argues that the court committed plain error in sentencing him because the court gave
significant weight to one of his prior convictions.
After careful review, we find no abuse of discretion, see United States v.
Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-16 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review), much less plain
error, and we affirm the judgment. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted, but we
direct counsel to inform appellant about the procedures for filing a petition for
rehearing and for certiorari.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
-2-
Appellate Case: 14-3257
Page: 2
Date Filed: 03/23/2015 Entry ID: 4257080
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?