Jessica Kampschroer, et al v. Ramsey County, et al
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, James B. Loken and Kermit E. Bye (PUBLISHED) [4444032] [14-3527, 14-3529, 14-3533, 14-3537, 14-3539, 14-3540, 14-3542, 14-3543, 14-3600, 15-1488]
United States Court of Appeals
For The Eighth Circuit
Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
VOICE (314) 244-2400
FAX (314) 244-2780
www.ca8.uscourts.gov
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
September 01, 2016
West Publishing
Opinions Clerk
610 Opperman Drive
Building D D4-40
Eagan, MN 55123-0000
RE: 14-3527
14-3529
14-3533
14-3537
14-3539
14-3540
14-3542
14-3543
14-3600
15-1488
Jessica Kampschroer, et al v. Ramsey County, et al
Jessica Kampschroer, et al v. Anoka County, et al
Jessica Kampschroer, et al v. City of Saint Paul, et al
Jessica Kampschroer, et al v. Beltrami County, et al
Jessica Kampschroer, et al v. Dakota County, et al
Jessica Kampschroer, et al v. City of Minneapolis, et al
Jessica Kampschroer, et al v. Olmsted County, et al
Jessica Kampschroer, et al v. Saint Louis County, et al
Jessica Kampschroer, et al v. City of Edina, et al
Patricia Karasov v. City of Minneapolis
Dear Sirs:
An opinion was filed today in the above cases.
Counsel who represented the appellants in No. 14-3527 was Robert B. Roche, of Saint
Paul, MN., Kimberly Parker of Saint Paul, MN.
Counsel who represented the appellant in No. 14-3529 was Bryan D. Frantz, Assistant
Anoka County Attorney, of Anoka, MN.
Counsel who represented the appellants in No. 14-3533 was Sara R. Grewing, City
Attorney, of Saint Paul, MN., Cheri M. Sisk, Assistant City Attorney, of Saint Paul, MN.
Counsel who represented the appellants in No. 14-3537 was Joseph E. Flynn, of Lake
Elmo, MN., Jamie L. Jonassen, of Lake Elmo, MN.
Counsel who represented the appellants in No. 14-3539 was Amelia Jadoo, Assistant
Dakota County Attorney, of Hastings, MN.
Counsel who represented the appellants in No. 14-3540 was Susan L. Segal, City
Attorney, of Minneapolis, MN., C. Lynne Fundingsland, Assistant City Attorney, of
Minneapolis, MN., Gregory P. Sautter, Assistant City Attorney, of Minneapolis, MN., Kristin R.
Sarff, Assistant City Attorney, of Minneapolis, MN.
Appellate Case: 14-3527
Page: 1
Date Filed: 09/01/2016 Entry ID: 4444032
Counsel who represented the appellant in No. 14-3542 was Gregory J. Griffiths, of
Rochester, MN.
Counsel who represented the appellants in No. 14-3543 was Nick D. Campanario,
Assistant County Attorney, of Duluth, MN.
Counsel who represented the appellants in No. 14-3600 was Mark P. Hodkinson, of
Minneapolis, MN., Christine E. Hinrichs, of Minneapolis, MN.
Counsel who represented the appellants in No. 15-1488 was Tracey Fussy, of
Minneapolis, MN.
Counsel who represented the appellees Jessica Leah Kampschroer and Cory Patrick
Kampschroer in Nos. 14-3527, 14-3529, 14-3533, 14-3537, 14-3539, 14-3540, 14-3542, 143543, 14-3600 was Jonathan A. Strauss, of Minneapolis, MN., Jeffrey M. Montpetit, of
Minneapolis, MN., Marcia Kay Miller, of Minneapolis, MN., Sonia Miller-Van Oort of
Minneapolis, MN., Susan M. Holden, of Minneapolis, MN., Lorenz F. Fett, Jr., of Minneapolis,
MN.
Counsel who represented the appellee Patricia Mae Kerasov in 15-1488 was Jonathan A.
Strauss, of Minneapolis, MN., Sonia Miller-Van Oort, of Minneapolis, MN., Lorenz F. Fett, of
Minneapolis, MN.
The judge who heard the case in the district court was Honorable Susan Richard Nelson.
The judgment of the district court was entered on November 3, 2014.
If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office.
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
AMT
Enclosure(s)
cc: Lois Law
MO Lawyers Weekly
District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 0:13-cv-02512-SRN
0:13-cv-02512-SRN
0:13-cv-02512-SRN
0:13-cv-02512-SRN
0:13-cv-02512-SRN
0:13-cv-02512-SRN
0:14-cv-01503-SRN
Appellate Case: 14-3527
Page: 2
Date Filed: 09/01/2016 Entry ID: 4444032
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?