Jessica Kampschroer, et al v. Ramsey County, et al

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, James B. Loken and Kermit E. Bye (PUBLISHED) [4444032] [14-3527, 14-3529, 14-3533, 14-3537, 14-3539, 14-3540, 14-3542, 14-3543, 14-3600, 15-1488]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 www.ca8.uscourts.gov Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court September 01, 2016 West Publishing Opinions Clerk 610 Opperman Drive Building D D4-40 Eagan, MN 55123-0000 RE: 14-3527 14-3529 14-3533 14-3537 14-3539 14-3540 14-3542 14-3543 14-3600 15-1488 Jessica Kampschroer, et al v. Ramsey County, et al Jessica Kampschroer, et al v. Anoka County, et al Jessica Kampschroer, et al v. City of Saint Paul, et al Jessica Kampschroer, et al v. Beltrami County, et al Jessica Kampschroer, et al v. Dakota County, et al Jessica Kampschroer, et al v. City of Minneapolis, et al Jessica Kampschroer, et al v. Olmsted County, et al Jessica Kampschroer, et al v. Saint Louis County, et al Jessica Kampschroer, et al v. City of Edina, et al Patricia Karasov v. City of Minneapolis Dear Sirs: An opinion was filed today in the above cases. Counsel who represented the appellants in No. 14-3527 was Robert B. Roche, of Saint Paul, MN., Kimberly Parker of Saint Paul, MN. Counsel who represented the appellant in No. 14-3529 was Bryan D. Frantz, Assistant Anoka County Attorney, of Anoka, MN. Counsel who represented the appellants in No. 14-3533 was Sara R. Grewing, City Attorney, of Saint Paul, MN., Cheri M. Sisk, Assistant City Attorney, of Saint Paul, MN. Counsel who represented the appellants in No. 14-3537 was Joseph E. Flynn, of Lake Elmo, MN., Jamie L. Jonassen, of Lake Elmo, MN. Counsel who represented the appellants in No. 14-3539 was Amelia Jadoo, Assistant Dakota County Attorney, of Hastings, MN. Counsel who represented the appellants in No. 14-3540 was Susan L. Segal, City Attorney, of Minneapolis, MN., C. Lynne Fundingsland, Assistant City Attorney, of Minneapolis, MN., Gregory P. Sautter, Assistant City Attorney, of Minneapolis, MN., Kristin R. Sarff, Assistant City Attorney, of Minneapolis, MN. Appellate Case: 14-3527 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/01/2016 Entry ID: 4444032 Counsel who represented the appellant in No. 14-3542 was Gregory J. Griffiths, of Rochester, MN. Counsel who represented the appellants in No. 14-3543 was Nick D. Campanario, Assistant County Attorney, of Duluth, MN. Counsel who represented the appellants in No. 14-3600 was Mark P. Hodkinson, of Minneapolis, MN., Christine E. Hinrichs, of Minneapolis, MN. Counsel who represented the appellants in No. 15-1488 was Tracey Fussy, of Minneapolis, MN. Counsel who represented the appellees Jessica Leah Kampschroer and Cory Patrick Kampschroer in Nos. 14-3527, 14-3529, 14-3533, 14-3537, 14-3539, 14-3540, 14-3542, 143543, 14-3600 was Jonathan A. Strauss, of Minneapolis, MN., Jeffrey M. Montpetit, of Minneapolis, MN., Marcia Kay Miller, of Minneapolis, MN., Sonia Miller-Van Oort of Minneapolis, MN., Susan M. Holden, of Minneapolis, MN., Lorenz F. Fett, Jr., of Minneapolis, MN. Counsel who represented the appellee Patricia Mae Kerasov in 15-1488 was Jonathan A. Strauss, of Minneapolis, MN., Sonia Miller-Van Oort, of Minneapolis, MN., Lorenz F. Fett, of Minneapolis, MN. The judge who heard the case in the district court was Honorable Susan Richard Nelson. The judgment of the district court was entered on November 3, 2014. If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court AMT Enclosure(s) cc: Lois Law MO Lawyers Weekly District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 0:13-cv-02512-SRN 0:13-cv-02512-SRN 0:13-cv-02512-SRN 0:13-cv-02512-SRN 0:13-cv-02512-SRN 0:13-cv-02512-SRN 0:14-cv-01503-SRN Appellate Case: 14-3527 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/01/2016 Entry ID: 4444032

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?