United States v. Ryan Sider
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Diana E. Murphy, C. Arlen Beam and Raymond W. Gruender (UNPUBLISHED) [4378763] [15-1257]
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-1257
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Ryan Siders
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids
____________
Submitted: March 14, 2016
Filed: March 17, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before MURPHY, BEAM, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
In 2008 Ryan Siders pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm and
was sentenced to 57 months imprisonment and a three year term of supervised
Appellate Case: 15-1257
Page: 1
Date Filed: 03/17/2016 Entry ID: 4378763
release. In 2015 the district court1 found Siders in violation of his supervised release
for the third time after he failed to comply with substance abuse testing, used a
controlled substance, consumed alcohol, and operated a motor vehicle while
intoxicated. The court revoked his supervised release. The advisory guidelines
sentencing range was 8 to 14 months. The court imposed a sentence of 12 months
imprisonment and one year of supervised release.
Siders argues that the court imposed a substantively unreasonable sentence
under 18 U.S.C. ยง 3553(a). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its
discretion in the sentence it imposed. See United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822,
824 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.
47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief United States District Judge for the
Northern District of Iowa.
-2-
Appellate Case: 15-1257
Page: 2
Date Filed: 03/17/2016 Entry ID: 4378763
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?