United States v. Ryan Sider


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Diana E. Murphy, C. Arlen Beam and Raymond W. Gruender (UNPUBLISHED) [4378763] [15-1257]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 15-1257 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Ryan Siders lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids ____________ Submitted: March 14, 2016 Filed: March 17, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before MURPHY, BEAM, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. In 2008 Ryan Siders pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm and was sentenced to 57 months imprisonment and a three year term of supervised Appellate Case: 15-1257 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/17/2016 Entry ID: 4378763 release. In 2015 the district court1 found Siders in violation of his supervised release for the third time after he failed to comply with substance abuse testing, used a controlled substance, consumed alcohol, and operated a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The court revoked his supervised release. The advisory guidelines sentencing range was 8 to 14 months. The court imposed a sentence of 12 months imprisonment and one year of supervised release. Siders argues that the court imposed a substantively unreasonable sentence under 18 U.S.C. ยง 3553(a). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in the sentence it imposed. See United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. -2- Appellate Case: 15-1257 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/17/2016 Entry ID: 4378763

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?