United States v. Jenny Tyler


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, James B. Loken and Duane Benton (UNPUBLISHED); Granting [4258000-2] motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Cory Jon Goldensoph. [4286411] [15-1275]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 15-1275 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Jenny Racheal Tyler lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, Waterloo ____________ Submitted: June 15, 2015 Filed: June 18, 2015 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. After revoking Jenny Tyler’s supervised release for release-condition violations that she admitted, the district court1 sentenced her to 8 months in prison and 1 year 1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. Appellate Case: 15-1275 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2015 Entry ID: 4286411 of additional supervised release, and added a special release condition requiring that she reside in a residential reentry center for 180 days after her release from prison. On appeal, Tyler challenges as unreasonable the condition on placement in a residential reentry center. After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion: the court made an individualized inquiry into the facts and circumstances underlying the case, and the special release condition was reasonably related to the 18 U.S.C. § 3553 sentencing factors. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d); United States v. Wiedower, 634 F.3d 490, 493 (8th Cir. 2011) (standard of review). The judgment is affirmed, and we grant counsel leave to withdraw. ______________________________ -2- Appellate Case: 15-1275 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/18/2015 Entry ID: 4286411

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?