United States v. Marvin Eason

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Diana E. Murphy, Lavenski R. Smith and Duane Benton (UNPUBLISHED) [4367622] [15-1765]

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-1765
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Marvin Leon Eason
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - Cape Girardeau
____________
Submitted: January 13, 2016
Filed: February 17, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before MURPHY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Marvin Leon Eason was convicted of possession of synthetic marijuana with
intent to distribute and being a felon in possession of a firearm after police found

Appellate Case: 15-1765

Page: 1

Date Filed: 02/17/2016 Entry ID: 4367622

drugs and a gun when executing a search warrant on his residence. The district court1
denied Eason's motion to suppress the evidence found during the search. Eason now
appeals that denial and the sufficiency of the evidence on the firearm charge. We
affirm.
Eason contends that the search warrant for his residence was not supported by
probable cause. We review a district court's factual findings supporting the denial of
the motion to suppress for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo. United States
v. Garcia-Hernandez, 682 F.3d 767, 771 (8th Cir. 2012). Probable cause for a search
warrant exists if there is a "fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will
be found in a particular place." Id. (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238
(1983)).
DEA task force officer Alan Nobles applied for the search warrant after a
confidential source made seven separate controlled purchases from Eason of "K-2,"
which is a synthetic cannabinoid and a controlled substance. As detailed in Nobles'
affidavit, Eason was at his residence before three of the purchases. On one occasion,
the source went to the convenience store where Eason worked and asked to buy K-2.
Eason left the store, drove home, returned to the store, and completed the sale. On
a second occasion, the source contacted Eason after he had left work. Officers
observed Eason arrive at his home, enter and leave the house, and then drive to the
parking lot of the store where he met the source. On a third occasion, the source
asked Eason to meet him at the store. Eason was seen leaving his home and driving
his car around to the basement. He then went inside the basement for a short period
before driving to the parking lot where he met the source.

1

The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the
Honorable Abbie Crites-Leoni, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
-2-

Appellate Case: 15-1765

Page: 2

Date Filed: 02/17/2016 Entry ID: 4367622

Eason was present at his home immediately before three sales of a controlled
substance, and on two occasions he went to his home after he was contacted by the
source and then went to the store to complete the sales. Those facts established a
nexus between the criminal activity and his residence. See Garcia-Hernandez, 682
F.3d at 771. The facts presented in Nobles' affidavit were sufficient to show that
there was a "fair probability" that drugs or other evidence would be found at Eason's
residence. Id. The district court therefore did not err in denying Eason's motion to
suppress.
Eason also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence on the firearm charge,
arguing that the government did not prove that he knowingly possessed the gun found
during the search. We review de novo the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the
conviction, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government and
accepting all reasonable inferences drawn from the evidence that support the jury's
verdict. United States v. Abdul-Aziz, 486 F.3d 471, 477 (8th Cir. 2007). Possession
of a firearm for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) may be either actual or
constructive. Id. Constructive possession is established if the defendant "has
dominion over the premises where the firearm is located, or control, ownership, or
dominion over the firearm itself" or "by a showing that the firearm was seized at the
defendant's residence." Id. (quoting United States v. Boykin, 986 F.2d 270, 274 (8th
Cir. 1993)).
At trial DEA agents testified that they found packages of "Moon Walk," "Mad
Hatter," "G Series," and "Scooby Snax" synthetic marijuana in a cabinet in the
basement of the house. The agents also found a .45 caliber pistol in a heating vent
in the basement bathroom. Jill Williams testified that she lived at the house with
Eason and her two children. Eason had mentioned to Williams several times that he
had a gun, but Williams did not know that there was a gun in the house. Williams
further testified that on the day of the search Eason told her that DEA agents had
searched the house and found a gun, and that she should say that it was hers. The jury
-3-

Appellate Case: 15-1765

Page: 3

Date Filed: 02/17/2016 Entry ID: 4367622

could infer that Eason had control over the gun from the fact that it was hidden near
where he kept the drugs he was dealing and from the fact that he told Williams to lie
about it. Moreover, the gun was found at Eason's residence and Williams, the only
other adult living at the house, did not know that there was a gun in the basement.
See Abdul-Aziz, 486 F.3d at 477. We conclude that there was sufficient evidence to
support the jury's finding that Eason knowingly possessed the gun.
For these reasons we affirm Eason's convictions.
______________________________

-4-

Appellate Case: 15-1765

Page: 4

Date Filed: 02/17/2016 Entry ID: 4367622