John Cottrell, et al v. Michael Duke, et al

Filing

OPINION FILED - THE COURT: William Jay Riley, Roger L. Wollman and Diana E. Murphy AUTHORING JUDGE:William Jay Riley (PUBLISHED) [4429172] [15-1869]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 www.ca8.uscourts.gov Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court July 22, 2016 West Publishing Opinions Clerk 610 Opperman Drive Building D D4-40 Eagan, MN 55123-0000 RE: 15-1869 John Cottrell, et al v. Michael Duke, et al Dear Sirs: A published opinion was filed today in the above case. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was Judith Scolnick, of New York, NY. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellant brief; Scott E. Poynter, of Little Rock, AR., John Givens Emerson, of Houston, TX., Corey D McGaha, of Little Rock, AR., William Thomas Crowder, of Little Rock, AR., Thomas L. Laughlin, IV, of New York, NY. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., of Los Angeles, CA. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellee brief; Teresa Wineland, of Little Rock, AR., Jess Askew, III, of Little Rock, AR., Mark Andrew Perry, of Washington, DC., Brian M. Lutz, of New York, NY., Alexander Kosta Mircheff, of Los Angeles, CA., George H. Brown, of Palo Alto, CA., Jonathan C. Dickey, of New York, NY. The judge who heard the case in the district court was Honorable Susan O. Hickey. The judgment of the district court was entered on April 7, 2015. If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court MDS Enclosure(s) cc: MO Lawyers Weekly District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 4:12-cv-04041-SOH Appellate Case: 15-1869 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/22/2016 Entry ID: 4429172

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?