John Cottrell, et al v. Michael Duke, et al
Filing
OPINION FILED - THE COURT: William Jay Riley, Roger L. Wollman and Diana E. Murphy AUTHORING JUDGE:William Jay Riley (PUBLISHED) [4429172] [15-1869]
United States Court of Appeals
For The Eighth Circuit
Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
VOICE (314) 244-2400
FAX (314) 244-2780
www.ca8.uscourts.gov
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
July 22, 2016
West Publishing
Opinions Clerk
610 Opperman Drive
Building D D4-40
Eagan, MN 55123-0000
RE: 15-1869 John Cottrell, et al v. Michael Duke, et al
Dear Sirs:
A published opinion was filed today in the above case.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was Judith Scolnick, of New
York, NY. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellant brief; Scott E. Poynter, of Little
Rock, AR., John Givens Emerson, of Houston, TX., Corey D McGaha, of Little
Rock, AR., William Thomas Crowder, of Little Rock, AR., Thomas L. Laughlin, IV, of New
York, NY.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr.,
of Los Angeles, CA. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellee brief; Teresa Wineland,
of Little Rock, AR., Jess Askew, III, of Little Rock, AR., Mark Andrew Perry,
of Washington, DC., Brian M. Lutz, of New York, NY., Alexander Kosta Mircheff, of Los
Angeles, CA., George H. Brown, of Palo Alto, CA., Jonathan C. Dickey, of New York, NY.
The judge who heard the case in the district court was Honorable Susan O. Hickey. The
judgment of the district court was entered on April 7, 2015.
If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office.
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
MDS
Enclosure(s)
cc: MO Lawyers Weekly
District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 4:12-cv-04041-SOH
Appellate Case: 15-1869
Page: 1
Date Filed: 07/22/2016 Entry ID: 4429172
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?