National Surety Corporation v. Dustex Corporation


OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Lavenski R. Smith, Steven M. Colloton and Jane Kelly AUTHORING JUDGE:Lavenski R. Smith (PUBLISHED) [4393634] [15-2096, 15-2328]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court April 29, 2016 Mr. Christopher P. Jannes DAVIS & BROWN Suite 1300 215 10th Street Des Moines, IA 50309-0000 RE: 15-2096 National Surety Corporation v. Dustex Corporation 15-2328 National Surety Corporation v. Miron Construction Co, Inc Dear Counsel: The court has issued an opinion in this case. Judgment has been entered in accordance with the opinion. Please review Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Eighth Circuit Rules on postsubmission procedure to ensure that any contemplated filing is timely and in compliance with the rules. Note particularly that petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc must be received in the clerk's office within 14 days of the date of the entry of judgment. Counsel-filed petitions must be filed electronically in CM/ECF. Paper copies are not required. No grace period for mailing is allowed, and the date of the postmark is irrelevant for pro-se-filed petitions. Any petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc which is not received within the 14 day period for filing permitted by FRAP 40 may be denied as untimely. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court SRD Enclosure(s) cc: Mr. Drew A. Cumings-Peterson Mr. William E McCardell Ms. Deborah Meiners Ms. Elizabeth R. Meyer Mr. James R. Murray Mr. Rob Phelps Mr. Todd Mitchell Rowe Mr. Todd S. Schenk Ms. Megan A. Senatori Ms. Heather C Sullivan Mr. Donald G. Thompson Mr. Mark L. Zaiger District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 6:13-cv-02004-EJM Appellate Case: 15-2096 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/29/2016 Entry ID: 4393634

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?