United States v. Alejandro Valencia


OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Raymond W. Gruender, Jane Kelly and Joan N. Ericksen AUTHORING JUDGE:Raymond W. Gruender (PUBLISHED) [4429192] [15-2173, 15-2192]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 www.ca8.uscourts.gov Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court July 22, 2016 Ms. Elizabeth Unger Carlyle #516 6320 Brookside Plaza Kansas City, MO 64113 Mr. Chad Garrett Gardner LAW OFFICE OF CHAD GARDNER 525 Southwest Boulevard Kansas City, MO 64108 RE: 15-2173 United States v. Alejandro Valencia 15-2192 United States v. Eric Rangel-Ortega Dear Counsel: The court has issued an opinion in these cases. Judgments have been entered in accordance with the opinion. The opinion will be released to the public at 10:00 a.m. today. Please hold the opinion in confidence until that time. Please review Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Eighth Circuit Rules on postsubmission procedure to ensure that any contemplated filing is timely and in compliance with the rules. Note particularly that petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc must be received in the clerk's office within 14 days of the date of the entry of judgment. Counsel-filed petitions must be filed electronically in CM/ECF. Paper copies are not required. No grace period for mailing is allowed, and the date of the postmark is irrelevant for pro-se-filed petitions. Any petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc which is not received within the 14 day period for filing permitted by FRAP 40 may be denied as untimely. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court SRD Enclosure(s) cc: Mr. Philip M. Koppe Mr. Eric Octavio Rangel-Ortega Mr. Bruce A. Rhoades Mr. Alejandro Valencia Ms. Paige Wymore-Wynn District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 4:13-cr-00164-DW Appellate Case: 15-2173 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/22/2016 Entry ID: 4429192

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?