Nit Wang v. Nebraska Public Power District


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Raymond W. Gruender, Morris S. Arnold and Bobby E. Shepherd (UNPUBLISHED) [4391998] [15-2234]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 15-2234 ___________________________ Nit Wang lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Nebraska Public Power District lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln ____________ Submitted: March 18, 2016 Filed: April 26, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before GRUENDER, ARNOLD, SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Nit Wang appeals the adverse judgment entered by the district court1 after a jury trial. He argues that the district court erred by misrepresenting evidence when 1 The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. Appellate Case: 15-2234 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/26/2016 Entry ID: 4391998 responding to jury questions. We cannot address the merits of this argument, as Wang has not provided a transcript of the trial proceedings. See Meroney v. Delta Int’l Mach. Corp., 18 F.3d 1436, 1437 (8th Cir. 1994) (although failure to provide complete transcript did not deprive court of jurisdiction, it did constitute grounds for dismissing appeal where lack of trial transcript prevented any meaningful review of issues raised by appellant); see also Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2) (describing appellant’s responsibility to provide transcript). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. ______________________________ -2- Appellate Case: 15-2234 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/26/2016 Entry ID: 4391998

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?