Aaron Olson v. United States Post Office


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: James B. Loken, Diana E. Murphy and Kermit E. Bye (UNPUBLISHED) [4374306] [15-2654]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 15-2654 ___________________________ Aaron Olson lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. United States Post Office lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis ____________ Submitted: March 1, 2016 Filed: March 4, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Appellate Case: 15-2654 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/04/2016 Entry ID: 4374306 Minnesota resident Aaron Olson appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se complaint alleging that he was assaulted by a postal worker, and the court’s denial of his motion to amend the complaint. After careful de novo review, see In re NVE Corp. Sec. Litig., 527 F.3d 749, 752 (8th Cir. 2008) (de novo review of denial of motion to amend complaint based on futility); Riley v. United States, 486 F.3d 1030, 1031 (8th Cir. 2007) (de novo review of dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction), we conclude that dismissal was appropriate for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Becky R. Thorson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2- Appellate Case: 15-2654 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/04/2016 Entry ID: 4374306

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?