Todd Luh v. Fulton State Hospital, et al


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Diana E. Murphy, Duane Benton and Jane Kelly (UNPUBLISHED); Granting [4313281-2] motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Mr. Todd James Luh. [4354581] [15-2895]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court January 11, 2016 Mr. Todd James Luh FULTON STATE HOSPITAL 610190 600 E. Fifth Street Fulton, MO 65251-1798 RE: 15-2895 Todd Luh v. Fulton State Hospital, et al Dear Mr. Luh: The court has issued an opinion in this case. Judgment has been entered in accordance with the opinion. The opinion will be released to the public at 10:00 a.m. today. Please hold the opinion in confidence until that time. Please review Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Eighth Circuit Rules on postsubmission procedure to ensure that any contemplated filing is timely and in compliance with the rules. Note particularly that petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc must be received in the clerk's office within 14 days of the date of the entry of judgment. Counsel-filed petitions must be filed electronically in CM/ECF. Paper copies are not required. No grace period for mailing is allowed, and the date of the postmark is irrelevant for pro-se-filed petitions. Any petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc which is not received within the 14 day period for filing permitted by FRAP 40 may be denied as untimely. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court MDS Enclosure(s) cc: Ms. Paige Wymore-Wynn District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 2:13-cv-04189-FJG Appellate Case: 15-2895 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2016 Entry ID: 4354581

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?