Clyde Harper v. Judge Coffey, et al
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Duane Benton, Pasco M. Bowman and Jane Kelly (UNPUBLISHED) [4375567] [15-2931]
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-2931
___________________________
Clyde E. Harper
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Judge Coffey; Prosecutor Retelsdorf, of Douglas County
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln
____________
Submitted: March 7, 2016
Filed: March 9, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Clyde E. Harper appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint seeking postconviction access to DNA testing of certain evidence used at
his state criminal trial. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
1
The Honorable John M. Gerrard, United States District Judge for the District
of Nebraska.
Appellate Case: 15-2931
Page: 1
Date Filed: 03/09/2016 Entry ID: 4375567
After carefully reviewing the record and Harper’s brief, this court finds no error
warranting reversal. See Dist. Attorney’s Office for Third Judicial Dist. v. Osborne,
557 U.S. 52, 69, 72-75 (2009) (discussing contours of substantive and procedural due
process rights related to postconviction access to DNA testing).
The dismissal is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2Appellate Case: 15-2931
Page: 2
Date Filed: 03/09/2016 Entry ID: 4375567
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?