United States v. Kendra Deshazer


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Steven M. Colloton, Morris S. Arnold and Bobby E. Shepherd (UNPUBLISHED) [4403233] [15-3151]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 15-3151 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Kendra Deshazer lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock ____________ Submitted: April 11, 2016 Filed: May 26, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. A jury convicted Kendra Deshazer of one count of producing a false identification document, see 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(1), two counts of misusing a social security number, see 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(7)(B), two counts of aggravated identity theft, see 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1), and one count of access device fraud, see 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2), stemming from two incidents where Deshazer allegedly used Appellate Case: 15-3151 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/26/2016 Entry ID: 4403233 another person's social security number to obtain credit. The first incident involved a loan to buy a car, and the second involved a Sears credit card. The district court1 denied her motion for judgment of acquittal, which Deshazer appeals as to the charges involving the Sears credit card. Deshazer maintains that the government failed to prove that she was the person who applied for the credit card. More specifically, she takes issue with the government's failure to call the Sears employee who helped her apply for the card to identify her. But viewing the sufficiency of the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury's verdict, see United States v. Hines, 472 F.3d 1038, 1039 (8th Cir. 2007) (per curiam), we reject Deshazer's contention because a verdict can be supported by circumstantial evidence alone, see United States v. White, 794 F.3d 913, 918 (8th Cir. 2015), and the circumstantial evidence linking Deshazer to the charges here is overwhelming. Deshazer admitted to investigating agents that she used the social security number to obtain the car loan only three-and-a-half months before the Sears card was applied for, which is quite telling. The government also produced evidence that Deshazer used the social security number when applying for an apartment, further supporting her identification as the perpetrator. The credit card application, moreover, contained Deshazer's name, address, and phone number, and bills were mailed to her address. In addition, the person to whom the social security number was assigned testified that the credit card was not hers. And finally, the jury could have compared the signature on the credit card application with the signatures on other documents known to be signed by Deshazer and introduced into evidence. We have previously concluded that such comparisons can support a jury's verdict. See United States v. 1 The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2- Appellate Case: 15-3151 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/26/2016 Entry ID: 4403233 Ryder, 414 F.3d 908, 914 (8th Cir. 2005). We therefore cannot say that no reasonable jury could have found Deshazer guilty. Affirmed. ______________________________ -3- Appellate Case: 15-3151 Page: 3 Date Filed: 05/26/2016 Entry ID: 4403233

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?