United States v. Deshawn Myrick
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: James B. Loken, Diana E. Murphy and Kermit E. Bye (UNPUBLISHED); Granting [4332523-2] motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Ms. Heather Quick. [4360797] [15-3153]
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-3153
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Deshawn Myrick, also known as Ricky Cooper, also known as Shakey
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport
____________
Submitted: January 18, 2016
Filed: January 28, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
At a supervised-release revocation hearing, the district court1 found that
Deshawn Myrick had committed several Grade C violations of his release conditions
1
The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the
Southern District of Iowa.
Appellate Case: 15-3153
Page: 1
Date Filed: 01/28/2016 Entry ID: 4360797
while serving a term of supervised release on a federal criminal sentence. The court
revoked supervised release and imposed a revocation sentence of 4 months in prison
and 56 months of supervised release. On appeal, Myrick contends that the new
supervised release term is substantively unreasonable. Upon careful review of the
record, including the district court’s comments at the revocation hearing about
Myrick’s criminal history, substance abuse, and supervised-release violations, we
conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion. See United States v. Asalati, 615
F.3d 1001, 1006 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review). The judgment is affirmed, and
we grant counsel leave to withdraw.
______________________________
-2-
Appellate Case: 15-3153
Page: 2
Date Filed: 01/28/2016 Entry ID: 4360797
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?