Leonard Noble v. Gunner Delay, et al
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Steven M. Colloton, Raymond W. Gruender and Jane Kelly (UNPUBLISHED) [4425911] [15-3624]
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-3624
___________________________
Leonard Noble
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Gunner Delay, Prosecuting Attorney, Sebastian County; Daniel Shue, Deputy
Prosecuting Attorney, Sebastian County
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Ft. Smith
____________
Submitted: July 7, 2016
Filed: July 14, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Appellate Case: 15-3624
Page: 1
Date Filed: 07/14/2016 Entry ID: 4425911
Leonard Noble appeals after the district court1 dismissed his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
complaint and denied his discovery-related motion. After careful review, we conclude
that the dismissal was proper, see Gunter v. Farmers Ins. Co., 736 F.3d 768, 771 (8th
Cir. 2013) (grant of motion to dismiss for failure to state claim is reviewed de novo),
and that Noble was appropriately denied an opportunity to conduct discovery, see
Steinbuch v. Cutler, 518 F.3d 580, 591 (8th Cir. 2008) (court did not abuse its
discretion by refusing to allow discovery where complaint lacked sufficient
allegations to state claim). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the
Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of
Arkansas.
-2-
Appellate Case: 15-3624
Page: 2
Date Filed: 07/14/2016 Entry ID: 4425911
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?