Inez Hunter v. Ford Motor Company, et al

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, Pasco M. Bowman and Diana E. Murphy (UNPUBLISHED) [4395299] [16-1042]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-1042 ___________________________ Inez Hunter lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Ford Motor Company, in Dearborn MI; Citi Financial Auto, (“CFA”) a corporation in Bedford, TX; Hastings Automotive Inc., (“HAI”), in Hastings, MN; Dion Carpenter, an individual; Doug Ericksen, an individual; John Does, I through X, sued in their individual and official capacities whose identities are not yet known lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis ____________ Submitted: May 2, 2016 Filed: May 4, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Appellate Case: 16-1042 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/04/2016 Entry ID: 4395299 Inez Hunter appeals after the District Court1 denied her motion for postjudgment relief in this pro se action related to the purchase and financing of a car. We conclude that the motion was properly denied. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(c) (time limits for filing a motion under Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure); Superior Seafoods, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 620 F.3d 873, 879 (8th Cir. 2010) (denying a Rule 60(d)(3) motion filed five years after judgment because the litigant was not without fault and the rule has an “equitable requirement that the party seeking relief be free from negligence and fault”); SDDS, Inc. v. South Dakota (In re SDDS, Inc.), 225 F.3d 970, 972 (8th Cir. 2000) (holding that a Rule 60(b) motion cannot “be used to collaterally attack a final court of appeals’ ruling in lieu of a proper petition for review in the United States Supreme Court”), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1007 (2001). Accordingly, we affirm. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2- Appellate Case: 16-1042 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/04/2016 Entry ID: 4395299

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?