United States v. Rashad McKay


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, Morris S. Arnold and Diana E. Murphy (UNPUBLISHED) [4429242] [16-1048]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-1048 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Rashad McKay, also known as Rashod McKay lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha ____________ Submitted: July 19, 2016 Filed: July 22, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Rashad McKay appeals after the district court1 denied him a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. ยง 3582(c)(2). Following careful de novo review, see United States 1 The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. Appellate Case: 16-1048 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/22/2016 Entry ID: 4429242 v. Long, 757 F.3d 762, 763 (8th Cir. 2014), we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2- Appellate Case: 16-1048 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/22/2016 Entry ID: 4429242

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?