United States v. Tracy Vaughn


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, Morris S. Arnold and Diana E. Murphy (UNPUBLISHED); Denying [4371180-2] objection to no argument status filed by Appellant Mr. Tracy Vaughn. [4440802] [16-1060]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-1060 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Tracy Vaughn, also known as Chopper lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha ____________ Submitted: August 19, 2016 Filed: August 24, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Tracy Vaughn appeals after the district court1 denied his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). After careful de novo review of the record, 1 The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. Appellate Case: 16-1060 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/24/2016 Entry ID: 4440802 we find no reason to reverse the district court’s denial of Vaughn’s motion for a sentence reduction. See United States v. Logan, 710 F.3d 856, 857 (8th Cir. 2013) (appeals court reviews de novo district court’s determination that movant was not eligible for reduction under § 3582(c)(2)). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and Vaughn’s pro se objection to submission of this appeal without oral argument is denied. ______________________________ -2- Appellate Case: 16-1060 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/24/2016 Entry ID: 4440802

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?