United States v. Tracy Vaughn

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, Morris S. Arnold and Diana E. Murphy (UNPUBLISHED); Denying [4371180-2] objection to no argument status filed by Appellant Mr. Tracy Vaughn. [4440802] [16-1060]

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-1060
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Tracy Vaughn, also known as Chopper
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
____________
Submitted: August 19, 2016
Filed: August 24, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Tracy Vaughn appeals after the district court1 denied his motion for a sentence
reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). After careful de novo review of the record,
1

The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska.

Appellate Case: 16-1060

Page: 1

Date Filed: 08/24/2016 Entry ID: 4440802

we find no reason to reverse the district court’s denial of Vaughn’s motion for a
sentence reduction. See United States v. Logan, 710 F.3d 856, 857 (8th Cir. 2013)
(appeals court reviews de novo district court’s determination that movant was not
eligible for reduction under § 3582(c)(2)).
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and Vaughn’s pro
se objection to submission of this appeal without oral argument is denied.
______________________________

-2-

Appellate Case: 16-1060

Page: 2

Date Filed: 08/24/2016 Entry ID: 4440802