United States v. Jessica Wallace
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Steven M. Colloton, Pasco M. Bowman and Raymond W. Gruender (UNPUBLISHED); Granting [4367053-2] motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Ms. Heather Quick. [4455637] [16-1138]
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-1138
___________________________
United States of America,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
Jessica Lynn Wallace,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Northern District of Iowa - Ft. Dodge
____________
Submitted: September 7, 2016
Filed: October 5, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Federal inmate Jessica Wallace pled guilty to conspiring to distribute 500
grams or more of a substance containing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
§§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846 (Count 1); possessing with intent to distribute 5
grams or more of actual methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and
(b)(1)(B) (Count 2); and possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking
Appellate Case: 16-1138
Page: 1
Date Filed: 10/05/2016 Entry ID: 4455637
crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (Count 3). The district court1 sentenced her
to concurrent prison terms of 120 months on Counts 1 and 2; a consecutive 60-month
term on Count 3; and 5 years of supervised release. This appeal followed, in which
Wallace’s counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the sentence was unreasonable based
on Wallace’s circumstances.
We conclude that counsel’s argument lacks merit because Wallace’s prison
term represents the statutory minimum, and therefore it is not subject to review for
reasonableness under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). See United
States v. Gregg, 451 F.3d 930, 937 (8th Cir. 2006). Further, having independently
reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no
non-frivolous issues for appeal.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed, and counsel’s
motion to withdraw is granted.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Northern District of Iowa.
-2-
Appellate Case: 16-1138
Page: 2
Date Filed: 10/05/2016 Entry ID: 4455637
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?