United States v. Eldon Philip Anderson


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Lavenski R. Smith, Morris S. Arnold and Bobby E. Shepherd (UNPUBLISHED); Granting [4373091-2] motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Ms. Katherian D. Roe. [4408988] [16-1214]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-1214 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Eldon Philip Anderson lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul ____________ Submitted: June 3, 2016 Filed: June 8, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SMITH, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Eldon Anderson appeals the district court’s1 order modifying his supervised release conditions to add a special condition that he reside for a period of up to 120 1 The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. Appellate Case: 16-1214 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/08/2016 Entry ID: 4408988 days in a residential reentry center, as approved by his probation officer. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in adding the condition, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2); and additionally, we decline to consider Anderson’s attempt, in his pro se submissions before us, to collaterally attack his underlying conviction, see United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 913 (8th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2- Appellate Case: 16-1214 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/08/2016 Entry ID: 4408988

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?