United States v. Eldon Philip Anderson
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Lavenski R. Smith, Morris S. Arnold and Bobby E. Shepherd (UNPUBLISHED); Granting [4373091-2] motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Ms. Katherian D. Roe. [4408988] [16-1214]
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-1214
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Eldon Philip Anderson
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul
____________
Submitted: June 3, 2016
Filed: June 8, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Eldon Anderson appeals the district court’s1 order modifying his supervised
release conditions to add a special condition that he reside for a period of up to 120
1
The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
Appellate Case: 16-1214
Page: 1
Date Filed: 06/08/2016 Entry ID: 4408988
days in a residential reentry center, as approved by his probation officer. Having
carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its
discretion in adding the condition, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2); and additionally, we
decline to consider Anderson’s attempt, in his pro se submissions before us, to
collaterally attack his underlying conviction, see United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d
910, 913 (8th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and we
affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
Appellate Case: 16-1214
Page: 2
Date Filed: 06/08/2016 Entry ID: 4408988
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?