Christine Brown v. Carolyn Colvin
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, Morris S. Arnold and Raymond W. Gruender (UNPUBLISHED) [4451262] [16-1235]
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-1235
___________________________
Christine Brown
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison
____________
Submitted: September 20, 2016
Filed: September 23, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Appellate Case: 16-1235
Page: 1
Date Filed: 09/23/2016 Entry ID: 4451262
Christine Brown appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the denial of
supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. We disagree with
Mrs. Brown that the administrative law judge (ALJ) did not adequately account for
her mental impairments in determining her residual functional capacity (RFC), see
Buford v. Colvin, 824 F.3d 793, 796 (8th Cir. 2016) (it is claimant’s burden to
establish RFC); and we conclude that substantial evidence on the record as a whole
supports the ALJ’s adverse decision, see Ash v. Colvin, 812 F.3d 686, 689-90 (8th
Cir. 2016) (substantial evidence is enough that reasonable minds would find it
adequate). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Erin Setser, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western
District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent
of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
-2-
Appellate Case: 16-1235
Page: 2
Date Filed: 09/23/2016 Entry ID: 4451262
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?