Calvin Hammock v. NASA Headquarters, et al

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: James B. Loken, Pasco M. Bowman and Diana E. Murphy (UNPUBLISHED) [4454943] [16-1301]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-1301 ___________________________ Calvin Hammock lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. NASA Headquarters; Department of Defense; Space Exploration Technologies Space X; Apple; Blackberry (Curve) Corporation; Virgin Mobile; Mediacom WiFi; American Water Iowa; Unknown Defendants lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport ____________ Submitted: October 3, 2016 Filed: October 4, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Appellate Case: 16-1301 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/04/2016 Entry ID: 4454943 Calvin Hammock appeals after the district court1 dismissed his pro se complaint. Upon careful review, we find no reason to reverse the dismissal order because, among other reasons, we agree with the district court that Hammock failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009); Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007); Kelly v. City of Omaha, 813 F.3d 1070, 1075 (8th Cir. 2016) (de novo review). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. -2- Appellate Case: 16-1301 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/04/2016 Entry ID: 4454943

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?