United States v. Juan Olivare
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Diana E. Murphy, Pasco M. Bowman and Duane Benton (UNPUBLISHED); Granting [4378147-2] motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Travis D. Poindexter. [4424553] [16-1355]
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-1355
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Juan Jose Olivares, also known as Juan Jose Oliveros
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: July 7, 2016
Filed: July 12, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Juan Olivares appeals from the sentence the District Court1 imposed after he
pleaded guilty to a drug offense. His written plea agreement included an appeal
1
The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
Appellate Case: 16-1355
Page: 1
Date Filed: 07/12/2016 Entry ID: 4424553
waiver. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the sentence was
unreasonable. We conclude that the appeal waiver is enforceable. See United States
v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing de novo “the validity and
applicability” of an appeal waiver); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889–92
(8th Cir.) (en banc) (discussing enforcement of appeal waivers), cert. denied, 540
U.S. 997 (2003). We have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly,
we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we dismiss this appeal.
______________________________
-2-
Appellate Case: 16-1355
Page: 2
Date Filed: 07/12/2016 Entry ID: 4424553
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?