Emanuel Swinton v. Hansens Truck Salvage Inc., et al

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: James B. Loken, Pasco M. Bowman and Diana E. Murphy (UNPUBLISHED) [4466781] [16-1470]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-1470 ___________________________ Emanuel L. Swinton lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Hansens Truck Salvage Inc.; U-Pick-It lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________ Submitted: October 20, 2016 Filed: November 7, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Emanuel Swinton appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se Title VII employment-discrimination action against his former 1 The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. Appellate Case: 16-1470 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/07/2016 Entry ID: 4466781 employer. We review de novo, see Spears v. Missouri Dep’t of Corr. & Human Res., 210 F.3d 850, 853 (8th Cir. 2000), and we agree with the district court that Swinton’s claims of race-based discriminatory discharge and retaliation are time-barred because he filed his lawsuit over seven months late. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1); Baldwin Cty. Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 149 (1984) (per curiam) (Title VII plaintiff must file suit within 90 days of receiving right-to-sue letter from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission). Contrary to Swinton’s assertion, the 90-day filing window applies equally to claims of race-based retaliation. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2- Appellate Case: 16-1470 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/07/2016 Entry ID: 4466781

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?