Dexter Brunson v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Diana E. Murphy, Steven M. Colloton and Raymond W. Gruender (UNPUBLISHED) [4477873] [16-1603]
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-1603
___________________________
Dexter A. Brunson
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff
____________
Submitted: December 6, 2016
Filed: December 9, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, MURPHY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Appellate Case: 16-1603
Page: 1
Date Filed: 12/09/2016 Entry ID: 4477873
Dexter A. Brunson appeals following the district court’s1 order affirming a
2012 administrative decision to deny a hearing on his third application for disability
insurance benefits. Brunson has abandoned any challenge to the only ruling properly
before this court by not raising it in his brief. See Freitas v. Wells Fargo Home
Mortg., Inc., 703 F.3d 436, 438 n.3 (8th Cir. 2013) (issue is deemed abandoned where
party fails to raise or discuss it in his brief); Carter v. Lutheran Med. Ctr., 87 F.3d
1025, 1026 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (dismissing pro se litigant’s appeal where
brief presented no question for appellate court to decide because it identified no basis
of alleged error by district court). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is
affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendation of the
Honorable J. Thomas Ray, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of
Arkansas.
-2-
Appellate Case: 16-1603
Page: 2
Date Filed: 12/09/2016 Entry ID: 4477873
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?