Charles LaLiberte v. Charles Samuels, Jr., et al


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Bobby E. Shepherd, Morris S. Arnold and Jane Kelly (UNPUBLISHED) [4475121] [16-2497]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-2497 ___________________________ Charles A. LaLiberte lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Director of Bureau of Prisons; Christopher Nickrenz lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________ Submitted: November 29, 2016 Filed: December 2, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SHEPHERD, ARNOLD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Charles LaLiberte appeals after the district court1 dismissed his pro se complaint. Upon careful review, we find no reason to reverse the dismissal order 1 The Honorable Stephen R. Bough, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. Appellate Case: 16-2497 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/02/2016 Entry ID: 4475121 because, among other reasons, we agree with the district court that it had no personal jurisdiction over defendants. See World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 291-92 (1980) (nonresident defendant must have minimum contacts such that suit “does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice”); Miller v. Nippon Carbon Co., 528 F.3d 1087, 1090-91 (8th Cir. 2008) (de novo review). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2- Appellate Case: 16-2497 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/02/2016 Entry ID: 4475121

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?