Charles LaLiberte v. Charles Samuels, Jr., et al
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Bobby E. Shepherd, Morris S. Arnold and Jane Kelly (UNPUBLISHED) [4475121] [16-2497]
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-2497
___________________________
Charles A. LaLiberte
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Director of Bureau of Prisons; Christopher Nickrenz
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: November 29, 2016
Filed: December 2, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SHEPHERD, ARNOLD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Charles LaLiberte appeals after the district court1 dismissed his pro se
complaint. Upon careful review, we find no reason to reverse the dismissal order
1
The Honorable Stephen R. Bough, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Missouri.
Appellate Case: 16-2497
Page: 1
Date Filed: 12/02/2016 Entry ID: 4475121
because, among other reasons, we agree with the district court that it had no personal
jurisdiction over defendants. See World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444
U.S. 286, 291-92 (1980) (nonresident defendant must have minimum contacts such
that suit “does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice”);
Miller v. Nippon Carbon Co., 528 F.3d 1087, 1090-91 (8th Cir. 2008) (de novo
review). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R.
47B.
______________________________
-2-
Appellate Case: 16-2497
Page: 2
Date Filed: 12/02/2016 Entry ID: 4475121
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?