Charles Swift v. Wadie Thomas, et al


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, Morris S. Arnold and Raymond W. Gruender (UNPUBLISHED) [4461349] [16-3200]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-3200 ___________________________ Charles Swift lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Wadie Thomas; Matthew Kahler lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha ____________ Submitted: October 20, 2016 Filed: October 21, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Charles Swift appeals after the district court1 dismissed, without prejudice, his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint requesting that the district court impose directions upon a 1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. Appellate Case: 16-3200 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2016 Entry ID: 4461349 state-court judge. Upon careful review, and for the reasons stated by the district court, we conclude that the dismissal was proper. See Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissal is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2- Appellate Case: 16-3200 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/21/2016 Entry ID: 4461349

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?