Charles Swift v. Wadie Thomas, et al
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, Morris S. Arnold and Raymond W. Gruender (UNPUBLISHED) [4461349] [16-3200]
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-3200
___________________________
Charles Swift
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Wadie Thomas; Matthew Kahler
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
____________
Submitted: October 20, 2016
Filed: October 21, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Charles Swift appeals after the district court1 dismissed, without prejudice, his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 complaint requesting that the district court impose directions upon a
1
The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District
of Nebraska.
Appellate Case: 16-3200
Page: 1
Date Filed: 10/21/2016 Entry ID: 4461349
state-court judge. Upon careful review, and for the reasons stated by the district
court, we conclude that the dismissal was proper. See Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170,
1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissal is reviewed de novo).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
Appellate Case: 16-3200
Page: 2
Date Filed: 10/21/2016 Entry ID: 4461349
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?