LANDRIGAN V SCHRIRO
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JEFFREY TIMOTHY LANDRIGAN, a.k.a. Billy Patrick Wayne Hill, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DORA B. SCHRIRO, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 00-99011 D.C. No. CV-96-02367-PHXROS ORDER
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court Filed September 4, 2007 Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge, Harry Pregerson, Stephen Reinhardt, Alex Kozinski, Michael Daly Hawkins, Kim McLane Wardlaw, William A. Fletcher, Marsha S. Berzon, Richard R. Clifton, Consuelo M. Callahan and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.
ORDER The mandate, issued on May 8, 2006, is recalled. In light of the Supreme Court's mandate, issued on July 30, 2007, in Schriro v. Landrigan, 127 S. Ct. 1933 (2007), we vacate our en banc decision, Landrigan v. Schriro, 441 F.3d 638 (9th Cir. 2006), and affirm the district court's denial of an evidentiary hearing on Landrigan's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We again adopt the three-judge panel's holdings with respect to the additional sentencing issues raised on appeal, Landrigan v. Stewart, 272 F.3d 1221, 1229-31 (9th Cir.
LANDRIGAN v. SCHRIRO
2001). Therefore, the district court's denial of Landrigan's petition for writ of habeas corpus is AFFIRMED.
PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE--U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST--SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2007 Thomson/West.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?