MAHARAJ V GONZALES
Filing
920060206
Opinion
<![CDATA[
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
VINODH PARSAD MAHARAJ; SUNITA DEVI MAHARAJ; PREETIKA MAHARAJ; MEENAL MAHARAJ; VINEET MAHARAJ, Petitioners, v. ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 03-71066 Agency Nos. A71-788-923 A71-788-924 A72-402-323 A72-402-324 A72-402-325
VINODH PARSAD MAHARAJ; SUNITA DEVI MAHARAJ; PREETIKA MAHARAJ; MEENAL MAHARAJ; VINEET MAHARAJ, Petitioners, v. ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 03-73995 Agency Nos. A71-788-923 A71-788-924 A72-402-323 A72-402-324 A72-402-325 ORDER
Filed February 6, 2006 Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.
ORDER Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by
1585
1586
MAHARAJ v. GONZALES
the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The threejudge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE--U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST--SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2006 Thomson/West.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
© 2024 Justia
