Dukes, et al v. Wal-Mart Stores
Filing
920090213
Opinion
<![CDATA[
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BETTY DUKES; PATRICIA SURGESON; CLEO PAGE; DEBORAH GUNTER; KAREN WILLIAMSON; CHRISTINE KWAPNOSKI; EDITH ARANA, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. WAL-MART, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-16720 D.C. No. CV-01-02252-MJJ ORDER No. 04-16688 D.C. No. CV-01-02252-MJJ
BETTY DUKES; PATRICIA SURGESON; CLEO PAGE; DEBORAH GUNTER; KAREN WILLIAMSON; CHRISTINE KWAPNOSKI; EDITH ARANA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WAL-MART, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Filed February 13, 2009
ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
1935
1936
DUKES v. WAL-MART, INC.
Judges McKeown, Rawlinson and Bybee did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE--U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST--SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
© 2024 Justia
