EDWARD JONES V CITY OF LOS ANGELES
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EDWARD JONES; PATRICIA VINSON; GEORGE VINSON; THOMAS CASH; STANLEY BARGER; ROBERT LEE PURRIE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; WILLIAM BRATTON, Chief; CHARLES BECK, Captain, in their official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 04-55324 D.C. No. CV-03-01142-ER Central District of California, Los Angeles ORDER
Filed October 15, 2007 Before: Pamela Ann Rymer and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges, and Edward C. Reed, Jr.,* District Judge.
ORDER The parties have filed a joint motion informing us that they have settled this action and seeking dismissal of the appeal, remand and withdrawal of our opinion, reported at 444 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 2006). Granting the motion in full, we dismiss this appeal as moot, vacate our opinion in Jones v. City of Los Angeles, 444 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 2006), and remand the action to the district court for further proceedings consistent
*The Honorable Edward C. Reed, Jr., Senior United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.
JONES v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES
with this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED.
PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE--U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST--SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2007 Thomson/West.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?