EDWARD JONES V CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Filing 920071016

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EDWARD JONES; PATRICIA VINSON; GEORGE VINSON; THOMAS CASH; STANLEY BARGER; ROBERT LEE PURRIE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; WILLIAM BRATTON, Chief; CHARLES BECK, Captain, in their official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-55324 D.C. No. CV-03-01142-ER Central District of California, Los Angeles ORDER

Filed October 15, 2007 Before: Pamela Ann Rymer and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges, and Edward C. Reed, Jr.,* District Judge.

ORDER The parties have filed a joint motion informing us that they have settled this action and seeking dismissal of the appeal, remand and withdrawal of our opinion, reported at 444 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 2006). Granting the motion in full, we dismiss this appeal as moot, vacate our opinion in Jones v. City of Los Angeles, 444 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 2006), and remand the action to the district court for further proceedings consistent
*The Honorable Edward C. Reed, Jr., Senior United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.

14139

14140

JONES v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

with this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED.

PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE--U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST--SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2007 Thomson/West.