HARPER V POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TYLER CHASE HARPER, a minor, by and through his parents Ron and Cheryl Harper; RON HARPER; CHERYL HARPER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; JEFF MANGUM; LINDA VANDERVEEN; PENNY RANFTYLE; STEVE MCMILLAN; ANDY PATAPOW, All Individually and in their official capacity as Members of the Board of the Poway Unified School District; DONALD A. PHILLIPS, Individually, and in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Poway Unified School District; SCOTT FISHER, Individually and in his official capacity as Principal of Poway High School; LYNELL ANTRIM, Individually and in her official capacity as Assistant Principal of Poway High School; ED GILES, Individually and in his official capacity as Vice Principal of Poway High School; DAVID LEMASTER, Individually and in his official capacity as Teacher of Poway High School; DOES 1 THROUGH 20, INCLUSIVE, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 04-57037 D.C. No. CV-04-01103-JAH Southern District of California, San Diego ORDER AMENDING OPINION
HARPER v. POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Filed May 31, 2006 Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Alex Kozinski, and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges.
ORDER The majority opinion filed April 29, 2006, is hereby amended as follows: 1. At Slip Op. at 4676, footnote 28, at the end of the footnote, add: "We do not exclude, however, the possibility that some verbal assaults on the core characteristics of majority high school students would merit application of the Tinker "intrusion upon the rights of other students" prong. That question is not presently before us." The dissenting opinion filed April 29, 2006, is hereby amended as follows: 1. At Slip Op. at 4710, footnote 11, between and , add: "The majority also does not "exclude . . . the possibility that some verbal assaults on the core characteristics of majority high school students would merit application of the Tinker `intrusion upon the rights of other students' prong." Id. at ___ n.28. Appellants' petition for rehearing en banc is still pending before this court.
PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE--U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST--SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2006 Thomson/West.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?