Pulido v. Hedgpeth
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL ROBERT PULIDO, Petitioner-Appellee, v. CHRIS CHRONES, Respondent-Appellant.
No. 05-15916 D.C. No. CV-99-04933-CW
MICHAEL ROBERT PULIDO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CHRIS CHRONES, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 05-16308 D.C. No. CV-99-04933-CW ORDER
ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Filed March 20, 2009 Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain, and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges.
ORDER In light of Hedgpeth v. Pulido, 555 U.S. __ (2008), 129 S. Ct. 530, which vacated the judgment of this court, 487 F.3d 669, and remanded, we in turn remand this case to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with the Supreme Court's determination that the appropriate standard of review in a case under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty
PULIDO v. CHRONES
Act of 1996 is harmless error, rather than structural error, when a jury is instructed on alternative theories of guilt. REMANDED.
PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE--U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST--SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?