Pulido v. Hedgpeth
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL ROBERT PULIDO, Petitioner-Appellee, v. CHRIS CHRONES, Respondent-Appellant.
No. 05-15916 D.C. No. CV-99-04933-CW
MICHAEL ROBERT PULIDO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CHRIS CHRONES, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 05-16308 D.C. No. CV-99-04933-CW ORDER
Filed June 9, 2009 Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain, and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges.
ORDER Petitioner-Appellant's Petition for Reconsideration of Dispositive Order, filed with this court on March 31, 2009 is GRANTED. The Order remanding the case, filed March 20, 2009 is VACATED. Petitioner-Appellant's Motion to file Supplemental Brief Following Supreme Court Remand, filed March 10, 2009 is GRANTED and Petitioner-Appellant's Supplemental Brief is ordered FILED.
PULIDO v. CHRONES
Respondent-Appellant is directed to file a responsive brief to Petitioner-Appellee's Supplemental Brief to address the application of the harmless error standard of Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619 (1993). Respondent-Appellant shall respond within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order, and Respondent-Appellant shall provide this court with ten (10) copies.
PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE--U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST--SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?