USA, et al v. Ressam
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AHMED RESSAM, also known as Benni Antoine Noris, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 05-30422 D.C. No. CR-99-00666-001JCC
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AHMED RESSAM, also known as Benni Antoine Noris, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-30441 D.C. No. CR-99-00666-001JCC ORDER
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court Filed August 15, 2008 Before: Arthur L. Alarcón, Pamela Ann Rymer, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.
ORDER The mandate of the United States Supreme Court having issued on Ahmed Ressam's appeal from his conviction for carrying an explosive during the commission of a felony in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(h)(2)(1994), United States v. Ressam, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 1858 (2008), we must now
UNITED STATES v. RESSAM
reach the government's challenge to the reasonableness of Ressam's sentence. United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984 (9th Cir. 2007) (en banc), was decided after sentence was imposed in this case and, among other things, Carty makes clear that all sentencing proceedings must begin by determining the applicable Guidelines range. Id. at 993. This was not done here. Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with Carty. VACATED AND REMANDED.
PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE--U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST--SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?