Williams v. Alamedia
Filing
920080529
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KEITH LEE WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, Jr., Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 05-55604 D.C. No. CV-03-00196-NM Central District of California, Los Angeles ORDER
Filed May 30, 2008 Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Carlos T. Bea, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.
ORDER Upon receiving certification that Keith Lee Williams did not submit himself to California state authorities within the 60-day conditional period set forth in Williams v. Alameida, 511 F.3d 973, 974 (9th Cir. 2007), we now dismiss Williams's appeal pursuant to the fugitive disentitlement doctrine. The mandate shall issue forthwith. IT IS SO ORDERED.
6089
PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE--U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST--SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?