Sprint Telephony PCS, et al v. County of San Diego, et al
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SPRINT TELEPHONY PCS, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, Plaintiff-AppellantCross-Appellee, and PACIFIC BELL WIRELESS LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, dba Cingular Wireless, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; GREG COX, in his capacity as supervisor of the County of San Diego; DIANNE JACOB, in her capacity as supervisor of the County of San Diego; PAM SLATER, in her capacity as supervisor of the County of San Diego; RON ROBERTS, in his capacity as supervisor of the County of San Diego; BILL HORN, in his capacity as supervisor of the County of San Diego, Defendants-AppelleesCross-Appellants.
Nos. 05-56076 05-56435 D.C. No. CV-03-1398-BTM ORDER
Filed May 14, 2008
SPRINT TELEPHONY PCS v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judges McKeown and M. Smith are recused.
PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE--U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST--SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?