Navajo Nation, et al v. USFS, et al

Filing 920071017

Opinion

Download PDF
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NAVAJO NATION; HAVASUPAI TRIBE; REX TILOUSI; DIANNA UQUALLA; SIERRA CLUB; WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE NATION; YAVAPAI-APACHE NATION; THE FLAGSTAFF ACTIVIST NETWORK, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and HUALAPAI TRIBE; NORRIS NEZ; BILL BUCKY PRESTON; HOPI TRIBE; CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; NORA RASURE, in her official capacity as Forest Supervisor, Responsible Officer, Coconino National Forest; HARV FORSGREN, appeal deciding office, Regional Forester, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees, ARIZONA SNOWBOWL RESORT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Defendant-intervenor-Appellee. No. 06-15371 D.C. Nos. CV-05-01824-PGR CV-05-01914-PGR CV-05-01949-PGR CV-05-01966-PGR 14133 14134 NAVAJO NATION v. USFS NAVAJO NATION; HUALAPAI TRIBE; NORRIS NEZ; BILL BUCKY PRESTON; HAVASUPAI TRIBE; REX TILOUSI; DIANNA UQUALLA; SIERRA CLUB; WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE NATION; YAVAPAI-APACHE NATION; CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY; THE FLAGSTAFF ACTIVIST NETWORK, Plaintiffs, and HOPI TRIBE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; NORA RASURE, in her official capacity as Forest Supervisor, Responsible Officer, Coconino National Forest; HARV FORSGREN, appeal deciding office, Regional Forester, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees, ARIZONA SNOWBOWL RESORT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Defendant-intervenor-Appellee. No. 06-15436 D.C. Nos. CV-05-01824-PGR CV-05-01914-PGR CV-05-01949-PGR CV-05-01966-PGR NAVAJO NATION v. USFS 14135 HUALAPAI TRIBE; NORRIS NEZ; BILL BUCKY PRESTON, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; NORA RASURE, in her official capacity as Forest Supervisor, Responsible Officer, Coconino National Forest; HARV FORSGREN, appeal deciding office, Regional Forester, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees. No. 06-15455 D.C. No. CV-05-01824-PGR ORDER Filed October 17, 2007 Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge. ORDER Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The threejudge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court. 1 Judges Hawkins and Bybee are recused. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE--U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST--SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted 2007 Thomson/West.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?