Uhm, et al v. Humana Inc, et al

Filing 920090722

Opinion

Download PDF
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DO SUNG UHM; EUN SOOK UHM, a married couple, individually and for all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HUMANA INC., a Delaware corporation; HUMANA HEALTH PLAN INC., a Kentucky corporation doing business as Humana, Defendants-Appellees. No. 06-35672 D.C. No. CV-06-00185-RSM Western District of Washington, Seattle ORDER Filed July 22, 2009 Before: Betty B. Fletcher, Richard A. Paez and Marsha S. Berzon,* Circuit Judges. ORDER Appellees' request for reconsideration shall be treated as a petition for panel rehearing and is GRANTED. The opinion filed on August 25, 2008 and reported at 540 F.3d 980 (9th Cir. 2008) is WITHDRAWN and shall not be cited as precedent. The petition for rehearing en banc is moot. The panel will file a new disposition in due course. *Due to the unavailability of Senior District Judge William Schwarzer, Judge Berzon has been randomly drawn as a replacement judge. 9381 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE--U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST--SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?