Sofris, et al v. Maple-Whitworth, Inc

Filing 920090311

Opinion

Download PDF
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In the Matter of: MAPLEWHITWORTH, INC., Debtor MICHAEL N. SOFRIS, aka Sofris APC, Appellant, v. MAPLE-WHITWORTH, INC.; UNITED STATES TRUSTEE; LARRY WEINSTOCK; MICA BINTU-BROWN; and EMANUEL PEREZ, Appellees. No. 07-56537 BAP No. CC-06-01098-KNB Central District of California, Los Angeles OPINION Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Klein, Nielsen, and Brandt, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding Argued and Submitted December 9, 2008--Pasadena, California Filed March 11, 2009 Before: John T. Noonan and Barry G. Silverman, Circuit Judges, and Suzanne B. Conlon,* District Judge. Opinion by Judge Conlon *The Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation. 3121 3122 IN THE MATTER OF MAPLE-WHITWORTH COUNSEL Michael N. Sofris, Michael N. Sofris APC, Beverly Hills, California, for the appellant Michael N. Sofris, aka Sofris APC. Jerry Kaplan; David Scott Kadin, Kaplan, Kenegos & Kadin, Beverly Hills, California, for the appellee Maple-Whitworth, Inc. OPINION CONLON, District Judge: This court's February 10, 2009 opinion recounts that Sofris, joined by others in the Mayman-Nathan faction, filed an involuntary Chapter 7 petition against Maple-Whitworth under 11 U.S.C. 303(a)-(b). Michael N. Sofris, aka Sofris APC v. Maple-Whitworth, Inc. (In re Maple-Whitworth, Inc.), ___ F.3d ___, No. 07-56537, 2009 WL 310902, at *1 (9th Cir. Feb. 10, 2009). This statement adopts the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's characterization of the involuntary petition as a Chapter 7 petition. Michael N. Sofris, APC v. MapleWhitworth, Inc. (In re Maple-Whitworth, Inc.), 375 B.R. 558, 563 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2007). Sofris filed a notice of errata stating that the involuntary petition was a Chapter 11 petition. No objection to the notice of errata has been filed. The record confirms that the involuntary petition sought relief under IN THE MATTER OF MAPLE-WHITWORTH 3123 Chapter 11. The February 10, 2009 opinion is corrected to reflect that the involuntary petition invoked Chapter 11, not Chapter 7.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?