Load, et al v. CIR
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LOAD, INC.; COAD, INC., Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
No. 07-72564 D.C. No. CIR-1 : 7287-02 OPINION
Appeal from a Decision of the United States Tax Court Stephen J. Swift, Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted January 14, 2009--San Francisco, California Filed February 2, 2009 Before: Myron H. Bright,* Procter Hug, Jr., and Stephen Reinhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam Opinion
*The Honorable Myron H. Bright, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.
LOAD, INC. v. CIR
COUNSEL John F. Daniels, Janice Procter-Murphy, Alexander Arpad, Phoenix, Arizona, for the petitioners. Richard T. Morrison, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Teresa E. McLaughlin, Kathleen E. Lyon, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.
OPINION PER CURIAM: Appellants LOAD, Inc. and COAD, Inc.1 challenge the Tax Court's determination of a federal income tax deficiency for the tax year ending September 30, 2000. The Tax Court held that certain of ADI's expenses were not deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses under 26 U.S.C. § 162(a) and must be capitalized as inventory costs under 26 U.S.C. § 263A.
Although only LOAD and COAD are parties to this petition for review, Associated Dealers, Inc. and 12 other affiliated companies have raised similar arguments and agree to be bound by the final outcome of this litigation. We refer to LOAD, COAD, Associated Dealers, Inc., and the 12 other affiliated companies as "ADI."
LOAD, INC. v. CIR
We review the Tax Court's findings of fact for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo. Kelley v. Comm'r, 45 F.3d 348, 350 (9th Cir. 1995). Our exclusive jurisdiction to review a final decision of the Tax Court arises under 26 U.S.C. § 7482. The Tax Court wrote an extensive opinion on this matter. See LOAD, Inc. v. Comm'r, 93 T.C.M. (CCH) 969 (2007). We approve and adopt that opinion as governing this case. Accordingly, we affirm.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?