Duque Mojica, et al v. Holder



Download PDF
Case: 07-73098 08/10/2012 ID: 8282383 DktEntry: 23-1 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT  LISBETH DUQUE MOJICA, Petitioner, ERIC H. HOLDER General, v. Jr., Attorney Respondent.   No. 07-73098 Agency No. A096-538-353 OPINION On Remand from the United States Supreme Court Filed August 10, 2012 Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, J. Clifford Wallace, and William A. Fletcher, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam Opinion 9137 Page: 1 of 4 Case: 07-73098 08/10/2012 9138 ID: 8282383 DktEntry: 23-1 Page: 2 of 4 MOJICA v. HOLDER OPINION PER CURIAM: Lisbeth Duque Mojica petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order upholding an immigration judge’s denial of cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a). In our original decision, we relied on MercadoZazueta v. Holder, 580 F.3d 1102 (9th Cir. 2009), to hold that Duque Mojica could impute her father’s legal status to herself to meet the five-year lawful permanent residence requirement under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(1). We therefore granted the petition for review. Duque Mojica v. Holder, No. 07-73098 (9th Cir. Dec. 27, 2010) (unpublished). The Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated our decision, and remanded for reconsideration in light of Holder v. Martinez Gutierrez, 132 S. Ct. 2011, 2017 (2012). See Holder v. Duque Mojica, 132 S. Ct. 2679 (2012). Because Mercado-Zazueta is no longer valid precedent on the issue of imputation under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b, see Sawyers v. Holder, ___ F.3d ___, 2012 WL 2507513 (9th Cir. June 29, 2012) (per curiam), we now reject Duque Mojica’s imputation argument making use of her father’s lawful permanent residence. As the parties do not dispute that Duque Mojica, on her own, lacks the requisite lawful permanent residence, we uphold the BIA’s decision to deny cancellation of removal. DENIED. Case: 07-73098 08/10/2012 ID: 8282383 DktEntry: 23-1 Page: 3 of 4 Case: 07-73098 08/10/2012 ID: 8282383 DktEntry: 23-1 Page: 4 of 4 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS—SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2012 Thomson Reuters.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?