The Facebook, Inc., et al v. ConnectU, Inc., et al
Filing
191
Filed (ECF) Intervenors Divya Narendra, Cameron Winklevoss and Tyler Winklevoss in 08-16745, Appellants Divya Narendra, Cameron Winklevoss and Tyler Winklevoss in 08-16873, 09-15021 Correspondence: Notice That Appellants Do Not Intend To Seek Further Appellate Review. Date of service: 06/22/2011 [7794234] [08-16745, 08-16873, 09-15021] (JBF)
CA Nos. 08-16745, 08-16873, 09-15021 (consolidated)
DC No. C 07-01389 JWW
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
THE FACEBOOK, INC.; MARK ZUCKERBERG,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
DIVYA NARENDRA; CAMERON WINKLEVOSS;
TYLER WINKLEVOSS,
Intervenors,
v.
PACIFIC NORTHWEST SOFTWARE, INC.;
WAYNE CHANG; WINSTON WILLIAMS,
Defendants.
Appeal From Judgment Of The United States District Court
For The Northern District Of California
(Hon. James Ware, Presiding)
NOTICE THAT APPELLANTS DO NOT
INTEND TO SEEK FURTHER APPELLATE
REVIEW
JEROME B. FALK, JR.
SEAN M. SELEGUE
SHAUDY DANAYE-ELMI
NOAH S. ROSENTHAL
HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY
FALK & RABKIN
A Professional Corporation
Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: 415/434-1600
Attorneys for Appellants and
Intervenors Cameron Winklevoss,
Tyler Winklevoss and Divya Narendra
Appellants
and
Intervenors
Cameron
Winklevoss,
Tyler
Winklevoss and Divya Narendra hereby provide notice that after
careful consideration, they have determined that they will not file a
petition for a writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court
in the above entitled case. Given this, and given that this Court’s
decision to stay issuance of the mandate in the above-captioned case
was premised upon the possibility of further appellate review,
Appellants no longer oppose issuance of the mandate, and have no
objection to vacatur of the stay of issuance of mandate.
DATED: June 22, 2011.
Respectfully,
JEROME B. FALK, JR.
SEAN M. SELEGUE
SHAUDY DANAYE-ELMI
NOAH S. ROSENTHAL
HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY
FALK & RABKIN
A Professional Corporation
By
/s/ Jerome B. Falk, Jr.
JEROME B. FALK, JR.
Attorneys for Appellants and
Intervenors Cameron Winklevoss,
Tyler Winklevoss and Divya Narendra
-1-
PROOF OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing NOTICE
THAT APPELLANTS DO NOT INTEND TO SEEK FURTHER
APPELLATE REVIEW with the Clerk of the Court of the United
States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by using the appellate
CM/ECF system on June 22, 2011.
Participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that
service will be accomplished by the appellate CM/ECF system.
I further certify that some of the participants in the case are not
registered CM/ECF users. On June 22, 2011, the foregoing document, described as NOTICE THAT APPELLANTS DO NOT
INTEND TO SEEK FURTHER APPELLATE REVIEW, was mailed
by placing the document for deposit in the United States Postal Service through the regular mail collection process at the law offices of
Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk & Rabkin, located at Three
Embarcadero Center, Seventh Floor, San Francisco, California, to
the following non-CM/ECF participants:
Mark A. Byrne
Byrne & Nixon LLP
800 W. Sixth Street, Suite 430
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Jonathan M. Shaw
Bois, Schiller & Flexner, LLP
5301 Wisconsin Avenue NW
Washington, D.C. 20015
Steven C. Holtzman
Bois, Schiller & Flexner, LLP
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
/s/ Jerome B. Falk, Jr.
JEROME B. FALK, JR.
W03 062211-180060001/PB12/1651541/F
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?