Log Cabin Republicans v. USDC-CAC

Filing 10

Order filed (DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, BARRY G. SILVERMAN and JAY S. BYBEE) Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. United States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. (KKW)

Download PDF
L o g Cabin Republicans v. USDC-CAC D o c . 10 F IL E D U N IT E D STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAN 22 2009 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U . S . C O U R T OF APPE A L S In re: LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, a n o n -p ro fit corporation. N o . 08-73194 D .C . No. 2:04-cv-08425-GPS C en tral District of California, Los Angeles L O G CABIN REPUBLICANS, Petitioner, ORDER v. U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF C A L IF O R N IA , Respondent, U N IT E D STATES OF AMERICA; et al., Real Parties in Interest. B efo re: O'SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges. P etitio n er has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of th is court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U n ited States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. KB/MOATT Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?