Log Cabin Republicans v. USDC-CAC
Electronically-filed document  Brief Submitted for Review (ECF Filing) is stricken because there is an error in the document (incorrect docket event used-see order). (LA)
L o g Cabin Republicans v. USDC-CAC
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F O R THE NINTH CIRCUIT
F IL E D
NOV 12 2008
M O L L Y C . D W YE R , C LE R K O F C O U R T U . S . C O U R T OF APPE A L S
In re: LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, a n o n -p ro fit corporation, - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- L O G CABIN REPUBLICANS, Petitioner, v. U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF C A L IF O R N IA , Respondent, U N IT E D STATES OF AMERICA; et al., Real Parties in Interest.
N o . 08-73194 D .C . No. 2:04-cv-08425-GPS-E C en tral District of California, Los A n g e le s
T h e electronically-filed document submitted on 11/10/08 and entitled "Log Cabin R e p u b lic an s ' Reply in Support of Petition for Writ of Mandamus" is stricken b ecau se there is an error in the document. The document was incorrectly su b m itted as a Reply Brief. Counsel for Petitioner is instructed to re-submit the d o cu m en t via CM/ECF using the category "Motions/Responses/Replies," and the en try "File a Reply to a Response to a Motion." Counsel is reminded to submit d o cu m en ts only in the correct case(s) when filing electronically. F O R THE COURT: M o lly C. Dwyer Clerk of Court By: Liora Anis D e p u ty Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?