Joseph Wood, III v. Charles Ryan
Filing
Filed Order for PUBLICATION (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, RONALD M. GOULD and JAY S. BYBEE) Petitioner filed a Consolidated Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for Stay of Execution before the Honorable Kim W. Wardlaw. Circuit Judge Wardlaw referred the Petition and Motion to this panel pursuant to Cir. R. 22-2(c) ( Once a case is assigned to a death penalty panel, the panel will handle all matters pertaining to the case . . . . ) and Cir. R. 22-4(e) ( In all capital cases where petitioner seeks a stay of execution, the Clerk shall refer any motion for a stay of execution to the death penalty panel. ). Under Fed. R. App. P 22(a), [a]n application for a writ of habeas corpus must be made to the appropriate district court. See also Felker v. Turpin, 518 U.S. 651, 660-61 (1996) (noting that the Rule would bar consideration of original habeas petitions in the courts of appeal ). Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 22(a), if a habeas petition is filed in the Court of Appeals, the application must be transferred to the appropriate district court. Therefore, the Consolidated Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for a Stay of Execution is transferred to the District of Arizona. TRANSFERRED. [9174604]
Case: 08-99003
07/18/2014
ID: 9174604
DktEntry: 107
Page: 1 of 2
FILED
JUL 18 2014
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSEPH RUDOLPH WOOD, III,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
CHARLES L. RYAN, interim Director,
Arizona Department of Corrections,
No. 08-99003
D.C. No. 4:98-CV-00053-JMR
District of Arizona,
Tucson
ORDER
Respondent - Appellee.
Before: THOMAS, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner filed a Consolidated Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and
Motion for Stay of Execution before the Honorable Kim W. Wardlaw. Circuit
Judge Wardlaw referred the Petition and Motion to this panel pursuant to Cir. R.
22-2(c) (“Once a case is assigned to a death penalty panel, the panel will handle all
matters pertaining to the case . . . .”) and Cir. R. 22-4(e) (“In all capital cases where
petitioner seeks a stay of execution, the Clerk shall refer any motion for a stay of
execution to the death penalty panel.”).
Case: 08-99003
07/18/2014
ID: 9174604
DktEntry: 107
Page: 2 of 2
Under Fed. R. App. P 22(a), “[a]n application for a writ of habeas corpus
must be made to the appropriate district court.” See also Felker v. Turpin, 518
U.S. 651, 660-61 (1996) (noting that the Rule would “bar consideration of original
habeas petitions in the courts of appeal”). Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 22(a), if a
habeas petition is filed in the Court of Appeals, “the application must be
transferred to the appropriate district court.”
Therefore, the Consolidated Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and
Motion for a Stay of Execution is transferred to the District of Arizona.
TRANSFERRED.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?