Armenia Cudjo, Jr. v. Robert Ayers, Jr.
Filing
16
Filed (ECF) Appellant Armenia Levi Cudjo, Jr. Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 11/13/2009 at 11:59 pm. Date of service: 10/16/2009. [7097183] (MRD)
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ARMENIA LEVI CUDJO, JR.,
v.
Petitioner-Appellant,
R.K. WONG, Warden,
Respondent-Appellee.
)
) CA No. 08-99028
)
) D.C. No. CV-99-08089-JFW
)
)
)
)
)
)
APPELLANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE OPENING BRIEF AND EXCERPTS OF RECORD
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER
United States District Judge
SEAN K. KENNEDY
Federal Public Defender
MARK R. DROZDOWSKI
KATHERINE FROYEN BLACK
Deputy Federal Public Defenders
321 East 2nd Street
Los Angeles, California
Telephone: (213) 894-2854
Facsimile: (213) 894-0081
Attorneys for Petitioner-Appellant
ARMENIA LEVI CUDJO, JR.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ARMENIA LEVI CUDJO, JR.,
v.
)
Petitioner-Appellant,
R.K. WONG, Warden,
Respondent and Appellee.
) CA No. 08-99028
)
) D.C. No. CV-99-08089-JFW
)
)
)
)
)
)
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
APPELLANT’S OPENING BRIEF AND EXCERPTS OF RECORD
Petitioner-Appellant Armenia Levi Cudjo, Jr. hereby requests an extension
of three weeks, to and including November 13, 2009, to file and serve his opening
brief and excerpts of record. This request is made under Rule 31 of the Federal
Rules of Appellate Procedure and Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b), and is based on the
attached Declaration of Mark R. Drozdowski. Cudjo will not make another
request to extend this deadline.
Dated: October 16, 2009
Respectfully submitted,
SEAN K. KENNEDY
Federal Public Defender
By /s/ Mark R. Drozdowski
MARK R. DROZDOWSKI
Deputy Federal Public Defender
Attorneys for Petitioner-Appellant
ARMENIA CUDJO
DECLARATION OF MARK R. DROZDOWSKI
I, Mark R. Drozdowski, declare:
1.
I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of California and
I am admitted to practice in this Court. I am a deputy federal public defender with
the Office of the Federal Public Defender for the Central District of California
(“FPD”). I am also the supervising attorney of the FPD’s capital habeas unit
(“CHU”), and as such am responsible for overseeing the CHU’s 17 attorneys and
its caseload of about 66 federal capital habeas cases (including two 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 actions), roughly 30 federal noncapital habeas cases and direct appeals,
and federal trial work. I am one of the attorneys assigned to represent Cudjo in
this appeal. I make this declaration in support of Cudjo’s request for a three-week
extension of time, to and including November 13, 2009, to file and serve his
appellant’s opening brief and excerpts of record. We have made good progress
since the last extension request but cannot adequately represent Cudjo without the
additional time requested herein.
2.
Cudjo filed, and the Court granted, six previous unopposed motions
for extensions of time to file and serve the opening brief and excerpts, bringing the
total amount of extensions granted thus far to 230 days, and making the current
due date for these documents October 23, 2009. I make this request for an
extension of three weeks because, given the staffing available for this case and the
work that remains to be done, I believe that we need that amount of time to
complete the brief and related work.
3.
I am primarily responsible for drafting the opening brief. The district
court sua sponte granted a certificate of appealability (“COA”) on one claim,
involving lethal injection, but we will seek to expand the COA in the opening
brief to include several other claims.
2
4.
One of the two other attorneys assigned to this case, Katherine Froyen
Black, went out on maternity leave on or about May 1, 2009. She will remain on
maternity leave until the end of October. She has been unavailable to work on this
case since going out on leave but will be able to assist in completing the brief if
this extension is granted. Ms. Black has worked on the case longer than me or the
other attorney on the case, John Littrell, and we consider her the lead lawyer on
the case. Her assistance will improve the quality of the brief and enable us to
complete the brief by November 13.
5.
Mr. Littrell has an active caseload in the FPD’s trial unit. He has
drafted parts of the brief addressing several claims. However, he was out of the
country on a prepaid vacation for most of September and was unable to work on
the brief then.
6.
The vast bulk of the legal research for my sections of the brief has
been completed, as have drafts of some sections of the brief, but I need additional
time to complete drafts of other sections. I have been unable to make more
progress on these tasks since I filed the previous extension request on September
16 because of my obligations as CHU supervisor and in other cases. In the past
month, I have spent at least 20 hours per week on administrative duties, including
a lot of time on attorney hiring and training. We have had three new attorneys join
our unit since the end of August and another has been hired to begin soon. I have
spent a considerable amount of time recruiting and training attorneys the past
month.
7.
In my cases, I have an evidentiary hearing motion due on October 23
in the capital habeas case Cain v. Wong, C.D. Cal. Case No. CV 96-2584-ABC.
I have spent time the past several weeks working on the motion and supervising
others on the case. I also spent time the past several weeks assisting the attorneys
3
and staff in the capital habeas cases Marlow v. Wong, C.D. Cal. Case Nos. CV 056477-ABC and CV 05-6478-ABC, where habeas petitions are due to be filed by
October 22.
8.
On October 13, I filed a protective federal habeas corpus petition on
behalf of the capital habeas petitioner in Howard v. Wong, CV 08-6851-SGL.
When I filed Cudjo’s prior extension request, I did not anticipate having to file a
petition on Howard’s behalf, but the Attorney General declined my request to file
a joint document with some additional language to try to further protect Howard’s
right to federal habeas review in the event his pending state petition, which was
filed past the presumptively timely deadline, is later deemed untimely. I spent a
lot of time working on the petition to file it within one year of the conclusion of
direct review (i.e., by October 14, 2009). This was time taken away from this
case.
9.
On Saturday, September 26, I attended a mandatory all-day training,
and on October 1 and 2, I attended a mandatory FPD retreat out of town.
Including those days, I have worked every day, including weekends and Columbus
Day, since filing the prior extension request to try to complete Cudjo’s brief and
meet my other obligations.
10.
I will be out of the office for most of October 16 on a pre-planned and
-paid vacation, returning the morning of Monday, October 19. I will be out of the
office for two weeks beginning on October 24 on a pre-planned and -paid
vacation. I had anticipated completing the brief before then, as stated in the prior
request, but now that I am behind schedule because of the Howard case and other
duties, these vacations are taking away time I could be working on the brief and
require me to ask for an extension until November 13, six days after I return from
the two-week vacation. I cancelled several vacations last June to complete an
4
opening brief in another capital habeas case (Fairbank) and do not wish to do so
again.
11.
Finally, my boss, Federal Public Defender Sean Kennedy, wants time
to review a draft of the brief before we file it, and I am going to be unable to do
that under the current deadline. Mr. Kennedy supports this extension request.
12.
For the reasons stated above and in the prior extension requests,
counsel for Cudjo have not been able to complete, and will not be able to
complete, the opening brief and excerpts by the current October 23, 2009 due date.
I respectfully request a three-week extension of time, to and including November
13, 2009, to file and serve the opening brief and excerpts of record. I have
exercised diligence and will file the brief and excerpts within the time requested. I
realize that the Court has been gracious in granting Cudjo’s extension requests,
and I will not make another request to extend the due date for the opening brief.
13.
On October 15, 2009, I left a message for Bill Bilderback, counsel for
Appellee, informing him that I intended to file this extension request and the
reasons therefore. He replied that Appellee does not oppose the request.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that
the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on October 16, 2009 at Los Angeles,
California.
/s/ Mark R. Drozdowski
MARK R. DROZDOWSKI
5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on October 16, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing
with the Clerk of the Court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit by using the appellate CM/ECF system.
I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and
that service will be accomplished by the appellate CM/ECF system.
By
/s/ Mark R. Drozdowski
MARK R. DROZDOWSKI
Deputy Federal Public Defender
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?